The European Perspective
Brussels Eyes Tobacco-Style Sin Tax for Vapes
European Health Commissioner Olivér Várhelyi is telegraphing a significant regulatory offensive, stating the EU will eventually equalize taxes on vapes and “classic tobacco products” (Politico). The move targets surging youth adoption—in Czechia, for instance, over 25% of young people now vape. While presented as a public health imperative, this harmonisation represents a substantial tax increase that risks treating harm-reduction products identically to their more dangerous counterparts. For free-market advocates, it raises questions about proportionate regulation, potentially stifling innovation that could migrate smokers to less harmful alternatives. The key challenge will be crafting policy that deters non-smokers without penalizing adults seeking an exit from combustible tobacco.
Nuclear Recklessness at Chernobyl
Russian military action triggered a power outage lasting more than three hours at the Chernobyl nuclear plant, interrupting electricity to the reactor’s protective sarcophagus (ZDF). Although backup power is in place, the event underscores the profound fragility of nuclear safety in a conflict zone. This isn’t just a tactical manoeuvre; it’s a high-stakes gamble with continental consequences. Each attack on energy infrastructure, particularly nuclear, introduces extreme tail risk. It also adds a risk premium to energy markets, evidenced by natural gas futures on the Dutch TTF—a key European benchmark—closing slightly higher at €31.4 per megawatt-hour (Ansa). This incident is a stark reminder that the weaponization of energy infrastructure extends to its most hazardous forms.
Germany Debates Domestic Drone Defense
In a significant pivot for German domestic security, Interior Minister Dobrindt is pushing to authorize the Bundeswehr—the federal armed forces—to counter suspected Russian drone incursions within national airspace (ZDF). Historically, deploying the military internally is a constitutional red line in Germany, reserved for catastrophic emergencies. This proposal reflects how hybrid warfare is blurring the lines between internal and external security threats. While pragmatic in the face of new airborne risks, it sets a precedent that should be watched closely. Allowing a military response to what is currently a policing and intelligence challenge risks a serious escalation and normalizes a domestic military footprint, a move libertarians will view with deep skepticism.
Catch the next Gist for the continent’s moving pieces.
|
Leave a Reply