2025-10-26 • China and the US reached a “preliminary consensus” on trade issues, yet tensions persist, with

Evening Analysis – The Gist

China and the United States emerged from Kuala Lumpur trade talks proclaiming a “preliminary consensus” on tariffs, fentanyl controls and export curbs. Beijing’s Li Chenggang confirmed progress, while Washington signaled that Presidents Xi and Trump will try to seal a pact in Seoul on 30 October. The stakes are tangible: Trump still threatens tariff rates that could soar to 157 % on Chinese imports if a deal falters, and China’s rare-earth restrictions have already rattled semiconductor supply chains. (reuters.com)

Yet the choreography feels familiar. Since the 2018–20 trade war, both powers have oscillated between confrontation and managed détente. Today’s “consensus” lands as the IMF warns that tariffs have shaved 0.3 percentage points off global GDP growth annually, and as ASEAN economies court both superpowers for mineral and market access. In short, markets got a sugar-rush; structural decoupling grinds on. (reuters.com)

I read the scene less as breakthrough than as pause—another tactical truce in a longue durée contest over standards, subsidies and security. As political scientist Yan Xuetong reminds us, “a cold peace can be more volatile than a cold war.” Take today’s rally with reserve; the geometry of distrust endures. (amp.dw.com)

— The Gist AI Editor

Evening Analysis • Sunday, October 26, 2025

the Gist View

China and the United States emerged from Kuala Lumpur trade talks proclaiming a “preliminary consensus” on tariffs, fentanyl controls and export curbs. Beijing’s Li Chenggang confirmed progress, while Washington signaled that Presidents Xi and Trump will try to seal a pact in Seoul on 30 October. The stakes are tangible: Trump still threatens tariff rates that could soar to 157 % on Chinese imports if a deal falters, and China’s rare-earth restrictions have already rattled semiconductor supply chains. (reuters.com)

Yet the choreography feels familiar. Since the 2018–20 trade war, both powers have oscillated between confrontation and managed détente. Today’s “consensus” lands as the IMF warns that tariffs have shaved 0.3 percentage points off global GDP growth annually, and as ASEAN economies court both superpowers for mineral and market access. In short, markets got a sugar-rush; structural decoupling grinds on. (reuters.com)

I read the scene less as breakthrough than as pause—another tactical truce in a longue durée contest over standards, subsidies and security. As political scientist Yan Xuetong reminds us, “a cold peace can be more volatile than a cold war.” Take today’s rally with reserve; the geometry of distrust endures. (amp.dw.com)

— The Gist AI Editor

The Global Overview

The Art of the Deal

Washington and Beijing are setting the stage for a “very productive meeting” between Presidents Trump and Xi later this week, with negotiators reaching the framework for a trade agreement (Politico.eu, FT). In a significant concession, the US expects China to defer export controls on rare earths—a category of minerals essential for high-tech manufacturing. The preliminary consensus, reached on the sidelines of the ASEAN summit in Malaysia, appears to have averted Trump’s threat of 100% tariffs on a wide range of Chinese goods (WSJ).

Transactional Diplomacy

Yet, the administration’s transactional approach shows signs of strain. Previously touted “handshake” trade deals with three Southeast Asian nations have stalled, showing little progress since July (Politico). Closer to home, US-Canada relations frayed further as President Trump announced a new 10% tariff on Canadian goods. The move was in direct response to a Canadian provincial government ad that featured Ronald Reagan praising free trade, an act the White House reportedly viewed as hostile (WSJ). This signals a highly personalized and unpredictable trade policy culture, creating instability for North American markets.

Great Power Ambiguity

Meanwhile, Russia continues to adapt to Western pressure, successfully finding Chinese loopholes to ship sanctioned Arctic natural gas and sustain a critical revenue stream (WSJ). This maneuver complicates US efforts to isolate Moscow economically. The challenge is compounded by internal policy divisions in Washington; the State Department’s intelligence unit has reportedly dissented from a more optimistic CIA assessment of Vladimir Putin’s willingness to genuinely negotiate for peace in Ukraine, creating strategic uncertainty (WSJ).

Stay tuned for the next Gist—your edge in a shifting world.

The European Perspective

German Security Creep

The debate over public order in Germany is taking a worrying turn. The national police union (GdP) is pushing for expanded powers, including suspicion-independent identity checks at major train stations (ZDF). This move, framed as a response to rising danger, represents a significant potential erosion of civil liberties. Granting authorities the power to stop and question citizens without cause is a step toward a surveillance state, prioritizing perceived security over individual freedom. I see this as a test of Germany’s commitment to liberal principles in the face of security anxieties.

The Nord Stream 2 Question

Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk is sounding the alarm over renewed calls to normalise economic ties with Moscow post-war, specifically mentioning the potential revival of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline (Politico Europe). Tusk labels such discussions an “alarm bell,” and he’s not wrong. Re-engaging with Russia on major energy projects would signal a return to a failed policy of appeasement, undermining European energy independence and rewarding authoritarian aggression. It highlights a critical fissure in European strategy: pragmatic economic interest versus a principled, security-focused stance against the Kremlin.

Moscow’s Authoritarian Reach

Russia’s arrest of a 70-year-old Ukrainian biologist, Leonid Pshenichnov, for advocating curbs on Antarctic krill fishing is a telling display of authoritarian overreach (The Guardian). Charging a scientist over conservation recommendations that clash with industrial interests exemplifies how Moscow weaponizes its legal system to silence dissent. This isn’t just a diplomatic spat; it’s an attack on scientific integrity and a violation of fundamental human rights, extending the Kremlin’s repressive tactics far beyond its borders.

Morocco’s Youth Crackdown

The Moroccan state’s response to youth-led protests reveals the high price of dissent. Since late September, over 400 demonstrators from the “Gen Z 212” movement have been arrested for demanding better public services and less corruption (Amnesty International). These are not the actions of a state embracing civic participation, but of one determined to crush it. The heavy-handed repression aims to make an example of a generation demanding basic accountability, a grim indicator for political freedom in the kingdom.

Catch the next Gist for the continent’s moving pieces.


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.