Washington Intervenes in Caracas
Following a “dark and deadly” US operation, Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has been captured and removed from the country (Bloomberg), (FT). President Trump announced the US would “run Venezuela” in the interim until a transitional government can be established (Bloomberg). This direct intervention marks a significant escalation of US foreign policy, moving from economic and military pressure to overt control. From a libertarian standpoint, this raises profound questions about national sovereignty and the appropriate use of military power, even against authoritarian regimes. The long-term stability and liberty of the Venezuelan people remain the central, unanswered questions.
Markets Shrug Off Geopolitical Shock
Despite the seismic events in Venezuela, global oil markets are expected to absorb the shock with minimal disruption (Bloomberg). The reason is a well-supplied global market, demonstrating the resilience of free markets in adapting to geopolitical crises. This stability underscores how diversified supply chains and robust production can mitigate the impact of localized political turmoil, a core tenet of open trade. For consumers, this means the price at the pump is unlikely to spike significantly due to the regime change in Caracas.
The Empowered Patient vs. The Nanny State
A growing trend in personal health sees consumers bypassing traditional gatekeepers, with services from Oura and Whoop now offering direct-to-consumer blood panels (Wired). This move empowers individuals with their own health data, fostering greater personal responsibility. In a parallel debate over financial well-being, however, proposals to make annuities a default option in retirement plans are gaining traction (WSJ). This approach, while aiming for security, risks limiting individual choice and creating a one-size-fits-all solution where personal risk tolerance and preference should reign supreme.
Education as a Barrier to Entry
South Korea’s notoriously difficult English-language college-entrance exam, which led a top official to resign over its difficulty, highlights how educational systems can become barriers rather than facilitators of opportunity (WSJ). When standardized tests become so esoteric that they measure test-taking ability over actual knowledge or aptitude, they distort the meritocratic ideal. Such systems can inadvertently stifle innovation and social mobility by favoring rote memorization over critical thinking, a costly outcome for any society aiming to compete globally.
Stay ahead with The Gist—your essential briefing for a complex world.
Leave a Reply