2025-10-24 • U.S.–China trade talks at the ASEAN summit are more about damage control than détente, amid rising

Morning Intelligence – The Gist

Washington’s decision to revive top-level U.S.–China trade talks at tomorrow’s ASEAN summit in Kuala Lumpur is less détente than triage. Beijing’s He Lifeng and Washington’s Scott Bessent will meet under the shadow of Trump-era tariffs that now hit $312 billion in Southeast-Asian exports and threaten to double on Chinese goods within weeks. (reuters.com)

Markets should curb their relief. Both sides frame the encounter as “salvage” diplomacy after a spike in military and tech sanctions, and officials concede that even a symbolic Xi-Trump handshake at next week’s APEC summit is in jeopardy. With two-way trade still worth roughly $700 billion, a misfire would squeeze supply chains already shifting toward Malaysia and Vietnam. (reuters.com)

History suggests a structural impasse: the 1985 Plaza Accord solved currency frictions but launched decades of managed trade; today’s AI- and chip-centric rivalry is far stickier. Unless both capitals accept mutual vulnerability rather than seek unilateral leverage, the “talks” risk becoming theatre while tariffs harden into a new operating system for global commerce. As economic historian Adam Tooze reminds us, “geoeconomics is the continuation of war by other means.”

— The Gist AI Editor

Morning Intelligence • Friday, October 24, 2025

the Gist View

Washington’s decision to revive top-level U.S.–China trade talks at tomorrow’s ASEAN summit in Kuala Lumpur is less détente than triage. Beijing’s He Lifeng and Washington’s Scott Bessent will meet under the shadow of Trump-era tariffs that now hit $312 billion in Southeast-Asian exports and threaten to double on Chinese goods within weeks. (reuters.com)

Markets should curb their relief. Both sides frame the encounter as “salvage” diplomacy after a spike in military and tech sanctions, and officials concede that even a symbolic Xi-Trump handshake at next week’s APEC summit is in jeopardy. With two-way trade still worth roughly $700 billion, a misfire would squeeze supply chains already shifting toward Malaysia and Vietnam. (reuters.com)

History suggests a structural impasse: the 1985 Plaza Accord solved currency frictions but launched decades of managed trade; today’s AI- and chip-centric rivalry is far stickier. Unless both capitals accept mutual vulnerability rather than seek unilateral leverage, the “talks” risk becoming theatre while tariffs harden into a new operating system for global commerce. As economic historian Adam Tooze reminds us, “geoeconomics is the continuation of war by other means.”

— The Gist AI Editor

The Global Overview

Transatlantic Trade Tensions Flare

President Trump abruptly terminated all trade negotiations with Canada, citing an Ontario government ad critical of tariffs that featured former U.S. President Ronald Reagan. In a social media post, Trump labeled the ad “egregious behavior” and an attempt to interfere with U.S. court decisions on his tariff strategy (WSJ). This move injects significant uncertainty into the North American trade relationship, potentially impacting supply chains and cross-border business operations. Our view is that protectionist measures, while politically expedient, ultimately disrupt markets and harm consumers on both sides of the border through reduced choice and higher prices.

US Sanctions on Russia Roil Oil Markets

Washington has imposed new sanctions on Russia’s two largest oil producers, Rosneft and Lukoil, in an effort to curtail funding for the war in Ukraine. The sanctions, which threaten to penalize foreign financial institutions doing business with the firms, have prompted reports that major buyers in India and China are suspending or scaling back their purchases of Russian crude (Reuters, CBC). India’s Reliance Industries, a top buyer, is reportedly considering a halt to imports. This action could remove a significant volume of oil from global markets, potentially driving up energy prices worldwide if alternative supplies are not secured.

Europe’s Risky Bet on Chinese Solar

Cybersecurity concerns are mounting in Europe over its heavy reliance on Chinese technology in the solar energy sector. Specifically, officials fear that solar inverters, critical components that connect panels to the grid, supplied by companies like Huawei could create a dependency crisis and pose a security risk (Politico.eu). Chinese firms control a substantial portion of the European solar market, with some estimates suggesting they supply over 80% of inverters. This dominance raises fears that hardware could be remotely accessed or disrupted, a vulnerability that mirrors earlier concerns about Chinese involvement in 5G telecommunications networks.

Dutch Housing Crisis Deepens

The Netherlands is grappling with a severe housing shortage of 400,000 homes, making it a central issue in the upcoming general election (Politico.eu). While there is broad political consensus on the need to build more, debates continue over where and how to construct new housing. This supply-side constraint is a classic example of how regulatory hurdles and land-use restrictions can stifle market responses to clear demand, driving up prices and limiting individual economic mobility. The situation underscores the necessity of liberalizing planning laws to allow for more rapid and flexible development.

Stay tuned for the next Gist—your edge in a shifting world.

The European Perspective

France’s Fiscal Reckoning

Moody’s, the credit rating agency, has signalled significant doubt over France’s capacity to control its public finances, calling the path to reining in the budget “very challenging” (Politico). The government in Paris is targeting €30 billion in savings to shrink its budget deficit to 4.7 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP)—a measure of a country’s economic output. Persistent political instability, however, is undermining these efforts. For markets, this raises the spectre of a potential credit downgrade, which would increase borrowing costs and could have a chilling effect on investment across the Eurozone’s second-largest economy. The verdict from Moody’s, expected shortly, will be a critical test of investor confidence in French fiscal discipline.

Trump’s New Trade Shockwave

President Trump is once again rewriting the rules of global commerce, this time on two fronts. He abruptly terminated “all trade negotiations” with Canada, a move that injects fresh uncertainty into North American supply chains (DW). Simultaneously, his administration unveiled “tremendous” new sanctions targeting Russia’s primary oil corporations, Lukoil and Rosneft (Politico). While ostensibly aimed at Moscow’s war machine, the sanctions will have a “catastrophic” impact on Lukoil’s European operations, potentially achieving what EU policy has not: a near-total cutoff of Russian crude. This two-pronged strategy underscores a transactional, and often volatile, US approach that is forcing European markets to adapt to geopolitical risk at a moment’s notice.

Catch the next Gist for the continent’s moving pieces.


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.