Nasdaq Drops 6% as Tech Firms Race for AI

Today’s essential intelligence on markets, energy, AI and geopolitics.

Key takeaways:
• Artificial Intelligence Integration and Impact
• Economic Inflation and Cost Pressures
• US Midterm Elections and Geopolitical Implications
• Scientific Research and Talent Dynamics

Tech selloff pulls money out of AI stocks ahead of midterms
Disappointing earnings from the largest US tech companies last week pushed investors out of AI-related shares and into smaller companies and defensive sectors, according to Bloomberg. German firms raise price plans as energy hits its highest level since 2022
Germany’s ifo institute (a Munich economic research body) reports that its price-expectations index, which tracks the share of firms planning price rises, climbed from 23.

Read the full newsletter: https://thegist.online/2026-11-02-nasdaq-100-dropped-6-as-tech-earnings-hit-en/
Subscribe free: https://thegist.online/subscribe-to-the-gist/?utm_source=podcast-en&utm_medium=show_notes

Listen to this episode

Transcript

JOHN: Welcome to The Gist. I’m John.

MARY: And I’m Mary. It’s Monday, November 2nd, 2026. We are your smart friends on the go. Let’s look at the board.

JOHN: Let’s start with Big Tech. Last week, earnings reports from the biggest US tech firms actually knocked the Nasdaq 100 index down six percent over two days. That is according to the options-research firm SpotGamma.

MARY: The market is asking a big question: who actually pays for all this Artificial Intelligence? AI needs massive data centers. Data centers need massive amounts of power.

JOHN: And this is where the resource flow gets really interesting. Tech companies are borrowing heavily to build this infrastructure. Just look at Meta. They sold 30 billion dollars in bonds late last year just to keep up. Tech boards are terrified of losing the AI race.

MARY: But who really benefits from that spending? The utility companies. Utilities make a guaranteed, regulated profit on every dollar they spend building new power plants. AI gives them the perfect excuse to build more.

JOHN: The catch? They pass those costs right onto everyday households. Your power bill goes up to fund the AI boom.

MARY: Which brings us to the politics. Tomorrow is Election Day in the US. Midterms. Power bills are a huge issue for voters. But Congress cannot fix household power rates. Those are set by state commissions.

JOHN: Exactly. We saw this in Virginia and New Jersey last year. Voters got mad at their power bills and elected new governors. Whoever wins Congress tomorrow inherits all that anger, with absolutely none of the tools to fix it.

MARY: So tech boards are playing a high-stakes game. Keep spending on AI and risk a repeat of the 1990s telecom bust. That debt-fueled buildout ended in massive bankruptcies in 2002.

JOHN: Or stop spending, and lose the future. It is a classic squeeze.

MARY: Moving to the Global Overview. That tech selloff we just mentioned? The money did not vanish. According to Bloomberg, investors just moved their cash.

JOHN: Right. They shifted out of AI and into defensive sectors. Think utilities and health care. These are companies whose sales hold up even when the broader economy slows down.

MARY: Jordan Jackson over at JPMorgan Asset Management calls this a “crisis of confidence.” He thinks it is overblown and expects markets to shift again after tomorrow’s elections.

JOHN: But there is a crack in the AI growth story. The Financial Times reports that AI infrastructure forecasts rely more and more on Elon Musk’s claims about SpaceX. If his targets fall short, the whole growth model takes a hit.

MARY: Meanwhile, China is playing a different game. Bloomberg notes that the Chinese AI firm DeepSeek just released a mode for users to build custom plugins.

JOHN: Who benefits there? Everyday users. While the US focuses on massive, expensive infrastructure, Chinese labs are competing on tools that are cheap to build and incredibly easy to adopt.

MARY: Let’s talk about another cost squeezing American businesses: health care. Researchers at RAND found that family premiums now average over twenty-eight thousand dollars a year.

JOHN: Some small businesses are now spending more on health insurance than they make in profit. And a decade of federal price-transparency rules has not fixed a thing.

MARY: Because knowing the price does not give you the power to change it. Hospitals and insurers hold all the leverage. They set the rates, and employers are forced to pay the bill.

JOHN: Finally, a quick note on the US elections from a pure business angle. It is a massive advertising event. Fox just reported higher profits thanks to political ad sales and the World Cup.

MARY: Broadcasters love a contested race. But do not expect instant results tomorrow night. Counting mail-in ballots in states like California and Alaska means control of Congress could take days to settle.

JOHN: Let’s cross the Atlantic for the European Perspective. Here in Germany, energy costs are biting back.

MARY: The ifo institute—a major economic research body in Munich—just released its latest numbers. Their price-expectations index tracks how many companies plan to raise prices. It jumped to 25.9 in October.

JOHN: That is up from 23 in September. Why? Crude oil and natural gas just hit their highest prices since 2022. Part of that is driven by blockades in Red Sea shipping chokepoints.

MARY: Who wins? Energy producers and suppliers. Who loses? Households and businesses locked into fixed contracts who have to absorb the shock.

JOHN: The head of economic research at ifo expects utilities to hike electricity and gas prices this winter. Inflation could cross three percent soon.

MARY: Across Europe, governments are watching the US midterms closely for any shift on tariffs, Ukraine funding, or security policy.

JOHN: But as Politico Europe points out, the real impact might be limited. The White House controls trade and foreign policy, regardless of who runs Congress. A Democratic House would mainly gain the power to investigate and block spending.

MARY: Still, there is a fascinating resource flow happening in science. Le Monde reports that budget cuts and political distrust in the US are pushing senior American scientists abroad.

JOHN: European universities are scooping them up. But here is the non-obvious angle: hiring top-tier scientists is basically an energy cost. Running heavy computing equipment for AI and research requires massive amounts of power.

MARY: Exactly. Europe gets the talent, but European labs now have to pay those surging German energy bills to actually produce the research.

JOHN: In other news, keep an eye on the UK. Il Sole 24 Ore reports London is prepping major concessions to Brussels ahead of an EU summit on November 20th.

MARY: The big-ticket item? Lower tuition fees for European students heading to UK universities. A clear move to rebuild bridges and attract talent.

JOHN: That brings us to the end of today’s board. So, what is the temperature today?

MARY: We are looking at a world caught in a massive infrastructure squeeze. From the tech giants borrowing billions for AI, to European labs importing scientific talent, everything requires more power. The companies controlling the energy flows are winning, while everyday households and small businesses are left holding the bill. Keep an eye on how tomorrow’s US elections channel this economic frustration.

JOHN: Well said. And hey, if you found today’s breakdown helpful, we’d love for you to join us every day. You can subscribe to The Gist’s daily newsletter for free—just tap the link right in our show notes. We do the reading, you get the edge.

MARY: See you tomorrow!


The Gist is an independent daily digest: AI-curated, human-directed, unapologetically liberal (how it’s made). Hundreds of sources, only what matters. Subscribe free or listen to the podcast.